Posts

Showing posts from March, 2021

IMMANUEL GRANADA/INFORMATION(s)

                INFORMATION                               Robbery in Band                               Illegal Cutting and Transport of Narra Trees                               Illegal Cutting of Coconut Trees                               Qualified Thief                               Rape                              Murder with Recidivism

IMMANUEL GRANADA/CITY OF DIPOLOG vs RUPERTO VIDAL

  CITY OF DIPOLOG vs. RUPERTO VIDAL                Complaint                Answer

compliance of Acopiado duly noted

Acopiado - Exercise on Information Information File Folder* *updated information on illegal cutting of coconut trees comment: the cutting of coconut tree must state the place where the coconut trees were cut, for jurisdictional purposes

exercise in criminal cases

  You are required to prepare an INFORMATION on the following crimes: (1) robbery in band (2) illegal cutting and transport of narra trees (3) illegal cutting of coconut trees  (4) qualified theft  (5) rape  (6) MURDER with recidivism due for submission next meeting.

NATAA/EXERCISE 2/ EXPROPRIATION

CITY OF DIPOLOG , represented by the HON. DARREL UY, City Mayor, Plaintiff , – versus –  RUPERTO VIDAL , Defendant .  – for–   “EXPROPRIATION” COMPLAINT ANSWER

GROUP WORK/EMINENT DOMAIN

  EMINENT DOMAIN PLEADINGS ( City of Iloilo vs. Hon Legaspi - G.R. No. 154614, November 25, 2004)   COMPLAINT  by Vera Nataa ANSWER  by Ariel Acopiado JA - PLAINTIFF  by Paula Bianca Eguia JA - DEFENDANT  by Cherrie Mae Aguila-Granada PRE-TRIAL BRIEF - PLAINTIFF  by Prince Dave Santiago PRE TRIAL BRIEF - DEFENDANTS  by Frilin Lomosad PRE-TRIAL ORDER  by Aisha Mie Faith Fernandez

FERNANDEZ/EXERCISE II/EXPROPRIATION

  1. COMPLAINT (Expropriation) Fernandez_Complaint 2.  ANSWER (Expropriation) Fernandez_Answer

LOMOSAD/EXERCISE II/EXPROPRIATION

  EXPROPRIATION PLEADINGS COMPLAINT ANSWER

EGUIA/SMALL CLAIMS/UNLAWFUL DETAINER

  SMALL CLAIMS 1. COMPLAINT https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vB8yuQYONCcqpZmMXHtGQM-0tINC5P5a/edit?usp=drive_web&ouid=115376224199196204974&rtpof=true 2. RESPONSE https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FVhJIm_u_xKXekKuSWWbRAFevBxQxO54/edit 3. DECISION https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GjkkE0XKSIhmrwFKtthwg7ss7gdhQo6i/edit?usp=drive_web&ouid=115376224199196204974&rtpof=true UNLAWFUL DETAINER 1. COMPLAINT https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UaouKoS_uJoJXqUR_phwi1t3QFDpgwS5/edit?usp=drive_web&ouid=115376224199196204974&rtpof=true 2. JUDICIAL AFFIDAVIT (PLAINTIFF) https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NkL-OqzaDH23wGorCtHqqtHVi-DhvU-Y/edit?usp=drive_web&ouid=115376224199196204974&rtpof=true 3. ANSWER https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sWGNX1AztrORBTWvegKqRekUYdA48b_f/edit 4. JUDICIAL AFFIDAVIT (DEFENDANT https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vbNBGv1IkQOQ2T4jSo7KSABJ60v18ybg/edit?usp=drive_web&ouid=115376224199196204974&rtpof=true
Acopiado - Expropriation 2 Complaint Answer

KARL RIGO ANDRINO/SMALL CLAIMS/UNLAWFUL DETAINER

  SMALL CLAIMS LINK: Statement of Claims-https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jGhRcg4B9l0_Vwzuz9UL6j7pCrRU75aG/view?usp=sharing Response- https://drive.google.com/file/d/167X1bOfnlLSJepzCJNBijMC-2qWc0nMd/view?usp=sharing Decision- https://drive.google.com/file/d/12f5sNXVdtNqoARbOxTg6xigvIi1TfgXe/view?usp=sharing UNLAWFUL DETAINER Complaint- https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_0rRdruxesPJ7TbvQ4OGn0oTZw65eYYl/view?usp=sharing Judicial Affidavit of Plaintiff- https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CWogjd2GYyyXwvwhneoJ4IlNwte1LvjV/view?usp=sharing Answer- https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Ba93ukCGAL-7oGppNaLcKqjozHlSgkcz/view?usp=sharing Judicial Affidavit of Defendant- https://drive.google.com/file/d/1w9uEjWssuoggZ1NwQmwXryevlabtSbUq/view?usp=sharing

CHERRIE MAE GRANADA/SMALL CLAIMS/UNLAWFUL DETAINER

 EXERCISE 1 Small Claims      Claims      Response      Decision Unlawful Detainer      Complaint      Judicial Affidavit of Complainants      Answer      Judicial Affidavit of Defendant

IMMANUEL GRANADA/SMALL CLAIMS/UNLAWFUL DETAINER

EXERCISE 1 Small Claims      Claims      Response      Decision Unlawful Detainer      Complaint      Judicial Affidavit of Plaintiffs      Answer      Judicial Affidavit of Defendant
Acopiado Small Claims: Complaint Response   Decision  Unlawful Detainer: Complaint + Judicial Affidavit Answer + Judicial Affidavit

COMPLIANCE NOTED/FERNANDEZ/EXERCISE I/SMALL CLAIMS/UNLAWFUL DETAINER

  UNLAWFUL DETAINER 1.Complaint  https://drive.google.com/file/d/1P86XnWi1LeOVzFovc_c5IHMgLxoIs2QD/view?usp=sharing 2.Answer with Counterclaim  https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Qyfef3D0-TBZ4KU4nWBK8gxzw4GwncPu/view?usp=sharing 3.Judicial Affidavit -Plaintiff   https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RKcfe-3DjtmU3BNMKVUHfVA3ODxFkhMq/view?usp=sharing 4.Judicial Affidavit - Defendant  https://drive.google.com/file/d/13CoWQbWJbFQVnjtp2hQy07ctzsavEWO5/view?usp=sharing SMALL CLAIMS 1. Complaint https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fYO9EfmcRDZEnskLwg8Aac0jb9Tgcbc-/view?usp=sharing 2. Response https://drive.google.com/file/d/12mIZsyXF7HzWempfa4jQAMVB27jFpZFd/view?usp=sharing 3. Decision https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jlmQ78_j35Xobh1UYQIgEZ7i5xD1RGsn/view?usp=sharing

NOTED FOR COMPLIANCE/LOMOSAD/EXERCISE I/SMALL CLAIMS/UNLAWFUL DETAINER

  SMALL CLAIMS 1. Statement of Claim https://drive.google.com/file/d/14OFKThn-X-kFglbVGuTDy_Z5pxR7mc1X/view?usp=sharing 2. Response https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZSwa3Ezc-ihtYaBOtq3zT_puozvlHyyE/view?usp=sharing 3. Decision https://drive.google.com/file/d/1dAxTGvnMcANvX83s6V0AwBbdp9eb6PJ2/view?usp=sharing UNLAWFUL DETAINER 1. Complaint https://drive.google.com/file/d/1sST-HZkrBaxzt5UtX4jOrslTEId3Phv3/view?usp=sharing 2. Judicial Affidavit - Plaintiff https://drive.google.com/file/d/1L1lUy1rYOKlQRIVo1eCwcT06v5mf5KWR/view?usp=sharing 3. Answer https://drive.google.com/file/d/1R6YpOcRZp8nI-tIczzHPqqOq3iY_Hx4P/view?usp=sharing 4. Judicial Affidavit - Defendant https://drive.google.com/file/d/1l_GXTGH9wouJmw1XVlix2ihvjUnpCpTA/view?usp=sharing

NOTED FOR COMPLIANCE/NATAA/EXERCISE- 1/SMALL CLAIMS/UNLAWFUL DETAINER

SMALL CLAIMS 1. Statement of Claim (Form 1-SCC): https://drive.google.com/file/d/1COB1snqI84vxL4hSiu_O4lktX4T_FIdX/view?usp=sharing 2. Response (Form 3-SCC): https://drive.google.com/file/d/1DRLumTyT7hI7p0h5V5ZKMgdTzh3-QEvL/view?usp=sharing 3. Decision (based on Compromise):     a.  Compromise (Form 9-SCC) https://drive.google.com/file/d/1N6UhKtxmvGPv0PTyrnAx4k7m4rlRNeX_/view?usp=sharing     b.  Decision  based on Compromise  (Form 10-SCC) https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZFfNEvhh2z8OK97PAmcI3sNrjXMzj-Xr/view?usp=sharing UNLAWFUL DETAINER 1. Complaint https://drive.google.com/file/d/1cFP1zF691sJ96-KJigN7SBbn9mTdc-AN/view?usp=sharing 2. Answer https://drive.google.com/file/d/14TDAXMrxwesFUjRUCDEF21aMqEufXHHj/view?usp=sharing 3. Judicial Affidavit- Plaintiff https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ikuOz8bS5cTH_JG1zsJtefo5IYrhVTp6/view?usp=sharing 4. Judicial Affidavit- Defendant https://drive.google.com/file/d/1INtJYVWgRUIeIUvrE9CpXDIqSf5MP2lT/view?usp=sha...

EXERCISE: using the case as posted here: prepare the complaint for eminent domain/ answer/ judicial affidavit/ pre-trial briefs/Pre-trial order/ decision/ and your decision on the matter as an RTC judge

  SECOND DIVISION G.R. No. 154614             November 25, 2004 THE CITY OF ILOILO, Represented by HON. JERRY P. TREÑAS, City Mayor,  petitioner, vs. HON. JUDGE EMILIO LEGASPI, Presiding Judge, RTC, Iloilo City, Branch 22, and HEIRS OF MANUELA YUSAY, Represented by SYLVIA YUSAY DEL ROSARIO and ENRIQUE YUSAY, JR.,  respondents. D E C I S I O N CHICO-NAZARIO,  J .: Via a Petition for Certiorari and Prohibition with Prayer for Issuance of a Writ of Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order, the City of Iloilo, represented by Mayor Jerry P. Treñas, seeks the nullification and/or modification of the Order dated 05 June 2002 of Honorable Emilio Legaspi, Presiding Judge, Regional Trial Court, Branch 22, Iloilo City, denying its Motion for Reconsideration of the court’s Order dated 15 April 2002, holding in abeyance the resolution of the Motion for Issuance of Writ of Possession until after it shall have rested its case. The factual...

EXERCISE : PREPARING THE COMPLAINT FOR EXPROPRIATION AND ANSWER/ class exercise/ submit next week/ per student

 FACTS: THE city of Dipolog headed by Mayor Darrel Uy upon a resolution passed by the City Sanggunian wants to expropriate  a land owned by Mr. Ruperto Vidal ( covered by TCT No. 4567, covered by Tax Declaration No. 980 with an area of 100 square meters) to be used as a a road connecting the National Highway to the Port of Galas. Negotiations were made but the owner refused the offer of 2M as fixed by the Sanggunian. Ruperto Vidal refused the offer since he wants the price to be 8M. He also reasoned out that his property is too small and he had no other property of his own, Said property is the site where her residential house is situated.He questions the taking as improper as there are other properties along the area which could be taken by the government. Ruperto Vidal, is 60 years old, a widower, and a retired public school teacher. PREPARE THE COMPLAINT FOR EXPROPRIATION of Mayor Darrel Uy and the ANSWER of Mr. Ruperto Vidal. Apply the procedure outlined under the Local Go...

EXERCISE 1 COURT PRACTICE (in the CITY COURT)

 FACTS: Mr. Santos obtained a loan from the Rural Bank of Dipolog for a sum of P30,000 at 3% per month and penalty charge of 2% per month if the obligation is not paid on time. This is evidenced by a promissory note. The loan is secured by a mortgage of his property (i.e. 250 square meters covered by TCT No. 5431 with an assessed value of P40,000. situated in Labason, zn).  Mr. Santos only paid two installment payments of the interest but the principal remained unpaid. The  promissory note already matured on February 30, 2021.  Mr. Jose Santos is 50 years old, employed as elementary school teacher in Segabe, single, resident of Katipunan St., Dipolog City. The Rural Bank of Dipolog is a banking corporation with principal office in Dipolog City. The court is filed in the City of Dipolog presided by Judge Chad Paler. Prepare the complaint for a small claim from the perspective of the Rural Bank of Dipolog. Prepare the ANSWER from the perspective of Mr. Santos. Prepare ...

for tonight: on the basis of the case, prepare: a judicial affidavit of the petitioner and judicial affidavit of the respondents. Prepare also the complaint and the Answer

  THIRD DIVISION APRIL 4, 2018 G.R. No. 195814 EVERSLEY CHILDS SANITARIUM, represented by DR. GERARDO M. AQUINO, JR. (now DR. PRIMO JOEL S. ALVEZ) CHIEF OF SANITARIUM,,  Petitioner vs SPOUSES ANASTACIO PERLABARBARONA , Respondents D E C I S I O N LEONEN,  J.: A case for unlawful detainer must state the period from when the occupation by tolerance started and the acts of tolerance exercised by the party with the right to possession. If it is argued that the possession was illegal from the start, the proper remedy is to file an  accion publiciana,  or a plenary action to recover the right of possession. Moreover, while an ejectment case merely settles the issue of the right of actual possession, the issue of ownership may be provisionally passed upon if the issue of possession cannot be resolved without it. Any fina1 disposition on the issue of ownership, however, must be resolved in the proper forum. This is a Petition for Review on  Certiorari   1 ...